設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明 文章總數:189181 瀏覽總數:364497438
文章總數:189181 瀏覽總數:364497439
點選此處可回到首頁!
法律知識庫 課程講座 法律圖書 電子報中心 回首頁
台灣法律網新訊



房客遲來的正義?!房東惡夢的開始?! 談租賃住宅市場發展及管理條例(租賃新法)的實施
臺灣新北地方法院106年度訴字第481號被告違反藥事法案件新聞稿
逗陣繞法院—宜蘭地方法院邀民眾體驗友善的司法環境
司法院大法官第1478次會議議決不受理案件
「宣判制度改革」記者會新聞稿
法務部107年「廉向─矯正好幫手」反貪宣導活動─「矯正廉能興革論壇」
臺北高等行政院審理106年度訴字第518號確認法律關係存在事件新聞稿
臺灣高等法院新增赴臺灣銀行公庫部繳納、金融卡繳納、匯款繳納刑事保證金及行動支付繳費
臺灣宜蘭地方法院 鄉親的好厝邊—民眾感受到法院的「溫度」
臺灣高等法院臺中分院,延續逗陣繞法院,民眾相邀作伙來
司法院於107.6.21∼107.8.29.委託循證民調有限公司,辦理107年一般民眾對司法認知調查,敬請民眾配合
包租代管服務幫房東 輕鬆收租租屋免煩惱
偽造信用卡罪不輕
國立台北教育大學附小的荒謬
學生校外住宿安全 東華外宿生命喪火窟,教部如何加強學生賃居安全?學生個別校外租屋或校方承租集合住宅作宿舍?不無審究之必要
學生校外住宿安全 文化大學宿舍選戰操作,「幫了侯友宜一個大忙嗎?」,不無審究之必要
學生校外住宿安全 文化大學宿舍提高安全標準違反法規?是否損及學生的平價住宿權利,不無審究之必要
學生校外住宿安全 東華外宿生命喪火窟 教部如何加強學生賃居安全?文化大學宿舍到期解約,是否損及學生的平價住宿權利,不無審究之必要
福建連江地方法院國民參與刑事審判模擬法庭
臺灣嘉義地方法院將舉辦「逗陣繞法院」新聞稿

 台灣法律網 > 法律知識庫 > 英美法 > 美國契約法(CONTRACTS)


Vogt v. Madden  / 劉育偉
Vogt v. Madden110 Idaho 6, 713 p.2d 442 Facts: The plaintiff and defendant had an oral sharecrop agreement for the year 1979, and they renewed the agreement for the year 1980.Under the agreement, certain expenses were borne by pl ......(詳全文) 2009-10-20 02:20:00
Spaulding v. Morse  / 劉育偉
Spaulding v. Morse322 Mass. 149, 76 N.E.2d 137 Facts: George and Ruth Morse were married in 1921. Ruth obtained a decree of divorce which made provision for the custody and support of two children in 1932. It was agreed that Geor ......(詳全文) 2009-10-19 02:20:00
Ragosta v. Wilder  / 劉育偉
Ragosta v. Wilder156 Vt. 390, 592 A.2d 367 Facts: In 1987, the plaintiff mailed the defendant a letter offering to purchase the property along with a check for$2,000 and began arrangements to obtain the necessary financing. Howe ......(詳全文) 2009-10-18 02:20:00
Raffles v. Wichelhaus  / 劉育偉
Raffles v. Wichelhaus2 Hurl. &C. 906 Facts: The plaintiff sold the cotton to the defendant. And the parties agreed to transit goods by ship, which called Peerless sailed in October. But the cotton was delivered by another and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-17 02:20:00
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc.  / 劉育偉
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc. 416 Mass. 684, 624 N.E.2d 959. Facts: The defendant operated a waste disposal facility to dispose of hazardous waste material and the plaintiffs(Polaroid Co. and Hooke ......(詳全文) 2009-10-16 02:20:00
Phillips v. Moor  / 劉育偉
Phillips v. Moor71 Me. 78. Facts: It was a negotiation by letter that the purchase of the hay in plaintiff’s barn had pressed by the defendant and it was a written invitation to the defendant to make an offer about the hay. ......(詳全文) 2009-10-15 02:20:00
Payen v. Cave  / 劉育偉
Payen v. Cave3 Term R. 148 Facts: The plaintiff sold a certain machine by auction under usual conditions that the high bidder should be the purchaser. The defendant bid the highest bid price 40 pounds but the auctioneer dwelt and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-14 02:20:00
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos  / 劉育偉
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos380 So.2d 516. Facts: The defendant, a patient, had suffered serious disease to cause her doctor to order nursing care for her, and the hospital implemented this order by calling upon the plain ......(詳全文) 2009-10-13 02:20:00
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino  / 劉育偉
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino144 F.3d 1384 Facts: The plaintiff is the retailer of tiles and the defendant is the manufacturer of tiles. The parties arrived at an oral agreement on the sale of ......(詳全文) 2009-10-12 02:20:00
Lucy v. Zehmer  / 劉育偉
Lucy v. Zehmer196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 Facts: Defendant wrote a note to the plaintiff, which stated that the defendant is selling their farm to the plaintiff for $50,000.  The plaintiff put the note in his pocket and offer ......(詳全文) 2009-10-11 02:20:00
Lonergan v. Scolnick  / 劉育偉
Lonergan v. Scolnick129 Cal.App.2d 179,276 P.2d 8. Facts: Defendant placed an ad for sale his land. The defendant sent a letter to plaintiff to ask his intention on March 26. On April 8, the defendant sent another letter which wa ......(詳全文) 2009-10-10 02:20:00
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc  / 劉育偉
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc 251 Minn. 188, N.W.2d 689 Facts: The plaintiff read the ads in the newspaper for certain furs on sale on a first come first serve. The plaintiff followed and was the first ......(詳全文) 2009-10-09 02:20:00
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.  / 劉育偉
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.238 La. 467,115 So.2d 821 Facts: The plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement which provided that the defendant had two years to cut and remove timber from plaintiff’s land, and that ......(詳全文) 2009-10-08 02:20:00
Klockner v. Green  / 劉育偉
Klockner v. Green254 A.2d 782 Facts: Plaintiffs were the stepson and stepgranddaughter of the decedent and defendants were the executor of the estate, the surviving next of kin of decedent, and a legatee under decedent’s la ......(詳全文) 2009-10-07 02:20:00
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.  / 劉育偉
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.277 S.W. 631. Facts: Plaintiff is a manufacturer of machinery for the purification of water in connection with the manufacture of ice in Chicago and defendant is engaged i ......(詳全文) 2009-10-06 02:20:00

[1] 2
免 費 電 子 報
發刊期數: 3720
律 師 的 叮 嚀

子女如果成才,縱使沒有給他任何財產,他還是會孝順你的;子女如果不成才,縱使你給他金山銀山,終究還是保不住。老而無產,子女又不孝,最是可悲;自己留有老本,縱使子女不孝,也不至於露宿街頭、無處安家。

劉孟錦律師


設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 網站合作 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明
法律具時效性,內容僅供參考,不宜直接引為訴訟用途,具體個案仍請洽詢專業律師
所有文章係作者之智慧,請尊重智慧財產權,轉載重製節錄請先取得本網之書面同意