設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明 文章總數:197490 瀏覽總數:443749384
文章總數:197490 瀏覽總數:443749385
點選此處可回到首頁!
法律知識庫 課程講座 法律圖書 電子報中心 回首頁
台灣法律網新訊



因工作調職或其他非自願性因素 而交易持有期間在兩年以下之房地,得按何種稅率課徵房地合一稅
臺北高等行政法院108年度停字第26號婦聯會與不當黨產處理委員會間聲請停止執行事件新聞稿
郭董生氣了
訴訟終結後,即無許可訴訟繫屬事實登記之必要(最高法院106年度台聲字第1108號民事裁定)
逃亡與脫逃,法律意義大不同
債權人就請求標的聲請對債務人為假處分,縱令於起訴後,祇要符合假處分要件之相關規定,法院即應准許,初無因有上述訴訟繫屬事實登記規定,得認為無假處分必要,而不予准許之理(最高法院97年度台抗字第339號民事裁定)
解說韓國瑜0088 扁蔡搞殘台灣經濟?勿低估選民智慧?
解說韓國瑜0089 解放軍穿越中線打「法律戰」?
解說韓國瑜0090 孫中山巧遇空心菜?總統是誰?
解說韓國瑜0084 越中線繞台?建立軍事互信及對話機制?
解說韓國瑜0085領海界限伴飛、熱線、迫降、擊落、遣返?
解說韓國瑜0086 王金平白居易 施恩即望報,吾非斯人徒?
解說韓國瑜0087 中美日台 三男一女 窈窕淑女,君子好逑?
民進黨總統延後初選的荒謬劇
司法院釋字第776號解釋摘要 設置停車空間於鄰地之套繪管制案
綠藍白競爭與台中美爭鋒
民進黨總統初選延長賽?
解說韓國瑜0076 初選延後?民主破產?誠信破產?
解說韓國瑜0077 初選延後? 英文耍狠?清德耍賴?
解說韓國瑜0078 英文退黨參選? 一人救一黨?一黨求一人?

 台灣法律網 > 法律知識庫 > 英美法 > 美國契約法(CONTRACTS)


Vogt v. Madden  / 劉育偉
Vogt v. Madden110 Idaho 6, 713 p.2d 442 Facts: The plaintiff and defendant had an oral sharecrop agreement for the year 1979, and they renewed the agreement for the year 1980.Under the agreement, certain expenses were borne by pl ......(詳全文) 2009-10-20 02:20:00
Spaulding v. Morse  / 劉育偉
Spaulding v. Morse322 Mass. 149, 76 N.E.2d 137 Facts: George and Ruth Morse were married in 1921. Ruth obtained a decree of divorce which made provision for the custody and support of two children in 1932. It was agreed that Geor ......(詳全文) 2009-10-19 02:20:00
Ragosta v. Wilder  / 劉育偉
Ragosta v. Wilder156 Vt. 390, 592 A.2d 367 Facts: In 1987, the plaintiff mailed the defendant a letter offering to purchase the property along with a check for$2,000 and began arrangements to obtain the necessary financing. Howe ......(詳全文) 2009-10-18 02:20:00
Raffles v. Wichelhaus  / 劉育偉
Raffles v. Wichelhaus2 Hurl. &C. 906 Facts: The plaintiff sold the cotton to the defendant. And the parties agreed to transit goods by ship, which called Peerless sailed in October. But the cotton was delivered by another and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-17 02:20:00
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc.  / 劉育偉
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc. 416 Mass. 684, 624 N.E.2d 959. Facts: The defendant operated a waste disposal facility to dispose of hazardous waste material and the plaintiffs(Polaroid Co. and Hooke ......(詳全文) 2009-10-16 02:20:00
Phillips v. Moor  / 劉育偉
Phillips v. Moor71 Me. 78. Facts: It was a negotiation by letter that the purchase of the hay in plaintiff’s barn had pressed by the defendant and it was a written invitation to the defendant to make an offer about the hay. ......(詳全文) 2009-10-15 02:20:00
Payen v. Cave  / 劉育偉
Payen v. Cave3 Term R. 148 Facts: The plaintiff sold a certain machine by auction under usual conditions that the high bidder should be the purchaser. The defendant bid the highest bid price 40 pounds but the auctioneer dwelt and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-14 02:20:00
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos  / 劉育偉
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos380 So.2d 516. Facts: The defendant, a patient, had suffered serious disease to cause her doctor to order nursing care for her, and the hospital implemented this order by calling upon the plain ......(詳全文) 2009-10-13 02:20:00
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino  / 劉育偉
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino144 F.3d 1384 Facts: The plaintiff is the retailer of tiles and the defendant is the manufacturer of tiles. The parties arrived at an oral agreement on the sale of ......(詳全文) 2009-10-12 02:20:00
Lucy v. Zehmer  / 劉育偉
Lucy v. Zehmer196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 Facts: Defendant wrote a note to the plaintiff, which stated that the defendant is selling their farm to the plaintiff for $50,000.  The plaintiff put the note in his pocket and offer ......(詳全文) 2009-10-11 02:20:00
Lonergan v. Scolnick  / 劉育偉
Lonergan v. Scolnick129 Cal.App.2d 179,276 P.2d 8. Facts: Defendant placed an ad for sale his land. The defendant sent a letter to plaintiff to ask his intention on March 26. On April 8, the defendant sent another letter which wa ......(詳全文) 2009-10-10 02:20:00
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc  / 劉育偉
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc 251 Minn. 188, N.W.2d 689 Facts: The plaintiff read the ads in the newspaper for certain furs on sale on a first come first serve. The plaintiff followed and was the first ......(詳全文) 2009-10-09 02:20:00
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.  / 劉育偉
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.238 La. 467,115 So.2d 821 Facts: The plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement which provided that the defendant had two years to cut and remove timber from plaintiff’s land, and that ......(詳全文) 2009-10-08 02:20:00
Klockner v. Green  / 劉育偉
Klockner v. Green254 A.2d 782 Facts: Plaintiffs were the stepson and stepgranddaughter of the decedent and defendants were the executor of the estate, the surviving next of kin of decedent, and a legatee under decedent’s la ......(詳全文) 2009-10-07 02:20:00
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.  / 劉育偉
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.277 S.W. 631. Facts: Plaintiff is a manufacturer of machinery for the purification of water in connection with the manufacture of ice in Chicago and defendant is engaged i ......(詳全文) 2009-10-06 02:20:00

[1] 2
免 費 電 子 報
發刊期數: 3720
律 師 的 叮 嚀

消費者參加(購買)會員制消費性契約,按其性質,契約雖已成立生效,但每一次的消費,時間、使用情形,均不確定(於消費者使用時始確定內容),於消費者使用時才發生實質上依約享受會員應有的權利,其未使用時,會員僅享有契約形式上的期待利益。

劉孟錦律師


設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 網站合作 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明
法律具時效性,內容僅供參考,不宜直接引為訴訟用途,具體個案仍請洽詢專業律師
所有文章係作者之智慧,請尊重智慧財產權,轉載重製節錄請先取得本網之書面同意